Initial Vexta Core v0.1.0 release
This commit is contained in:
commit
25c454329d
2481 changed files with 689289 additions and 0 deletions
387
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
Executable file
387
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py
Executable file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,387 @@
|
|||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2017-2021 The DigiByte Core developers
|
||||
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
||||
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
||||
"""Test the listsinceblock RPC."""
|
||||
|
||||
from test_framework.address import key_to_p2wpkh
|
||||
from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY_2
|
||||
from test_framework.key import ECKey
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import DigiByteTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.messages import BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER
|
||||
from test_framework.util import (
|
||||
assert_array_result,
|
||||
assert_equal,
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from test_framework.wallet_util import bytes_to_wif
|
||||
|
||||
from decimal import Decimal
|
||||
|
||||
class ListSinceBlockTest(DigiByteTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
self.num_nodes = 4
|
||||
self.setup_clean_chain = True
|
||||
|
||||
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
|
||||
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
|
||||
|
||||
def run_test(self):
|
||||
# All nodes are in IBD from genesis, so they'll need the miner (node2) to be an outbound connection, or have
|
||||
# only one connection. (See fPreferredDownload in net_processing)
|
||||
self.connect_nodes(1, 2)
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], COINBASE_MATURITY_2 + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
self.test_no_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_invalid_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_reorg()
|
||||
self.test_double_spend()
|
||||
self.test_double_send()
|
||||
self.double_spends_filtered()
|
||||
self.test_targetconfirmations()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_blockhash(self):
|
||||
self.log.info("Test no blockhash")
|
||||
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
assert_array_result(self.nodes[0].listtransactions(), {"txid": txid}, {
|
||||
"category": "receive",
|
||||
"amount": 1,
|
||||
"confirmations": 0,
|
||||
"trusted": False,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
blockhash, = self.generate(self.nodes[2], 1)
|
||||
blockheight = self.nodes[2].getblockheader(blockhash)['height']
|
||||
|
||||
txs = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
|
||||
assert_array_result(txs, {"txid": txid}, {
|
||||
"category": "receive",
|
||||
"amount": 1,
|
||||
"blockhash": blockhash,
|
||||
"blockheight": blockheight,
|
||||
"confirmations": 1,
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert_equal(len(txs), 1)
|
||||
assert "trusted" not in txs[0]
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(),
|
||||
{"lastblock": blockhash,
|
||||
"removed": [],
|
||||
"transactions": txs})
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(""),
|
||||
{"lastblock": blockhash,
|
||||
"removed": [],
|
||||
"transactions": txs})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_blockhash(self):
|
||||
self.log.info("Test invalid blockhash")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"42759cde25462784395a337460bde75f58e73d3f08bd31fdc3507cbac856a2c4")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be of length 64 (not 11, for 'invalid-hex')", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"invalid-hex")
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "blockhash must be hexadecimal string (not 'Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000')", self.nodes[0].listsinceblock,
|
||||
"Z000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_targetconfirmations(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
This tests when the value of target_confirmations exceeds the number of
|
||||
blocks in the main chain. In this case, the genesis block hash should be
|
||||
given for the `lastblock` property. If target_confirmations is < 1, then
|
||||
a -8 invalid parameter error is thrown.
|
||||
'''
|
||||
self.log.info("Test target_confirmations")
|
||||
blockhash, = self.generate(self.nodes[2], 1)
|
||||
blockheight = self.nodes[2].getblockheader(blockhash)['height']
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0),
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash, blockheight + 1)['lastblock'])
|
||||
assert_equal(
|
||||
self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0),
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash, blockheight + 1000)['lastblock'])
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Invalid parameter",
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock, blockhash, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reorg(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
`listsinceblock` did not behave correctly when handed a block that was
|
||||
no longer in the main chain:
|
||||
|
||||
ab0
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
aa1 [tx0] bb1
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa2 bb2
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa3 bb3
|
||||
|
|
||||
bb4
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a client that has only seen block `aa3` above. It asks the node
|
||||
to `listsinceblock aa3`. But at some point prior the main chain switched
|
||||
to the bb chain.
|
||||
|
||||
Previously: listsinceblock would find height=4 for block aa3 and compare
|
||||
this to height=5 for the tip of the chain (bb4). It would then return
|
||||
results restricted to bb3-bb4.
|
||||
|
||||
Now: listsinceblock finds the fork at ab0 and returns results in the
|
||||
range bb1-bb4.
|
||||
|
||||
This test only checks that [tx0] is present.
|
||||
'''
|
||||
self.log.info("Test reorg")
|
||||
|
||||
# Split network into two
|
||||
self.split_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# send to nodes[0] from nodes[2]
|
||||
senttx = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
# generate on both sides
|
||||
nodes1_last_blockhash = self.generate(self.nodes[1], 6, sync_fun=lambda: self.sync_all(self.nodes[:2]))[-1]
|
||||
nodes2_first_blockhash = self.generate(self.nodes[2], 7, sync_fun=lambda: self.sync_all(self.nodes[2:]))[0]
|
||||
self.log.debug("nodes[1] last blockhash = {}".format(nodes1_last_blockhash))
|
||||
self.log.debug("nodes[2] first blockhash = {}".format(nodes2_first_blockhash))
|
||||
|
||||
self.join_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# listsinceblock(nodes1_last_blockhash) should now include tx as seen from nodes[0]
|
||||
# and return the block height which listsinceblock now exposes since a5e7795.
|
||||
transactions = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(nodes1_last_blockhash)['transactions']
|
||||
found = next(tx for tx in transactions if tx['txid'] == senttx)
|
||||
assert_equal(found['blockheight'], self.nodes[0].getblockheader(nodes2_first_blockhash)['height'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_double_spend(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
This tests the case where the same UTXO is spent twice on two separate
|
||||
blocks as part of a reorg.
|
||||
|
||||
ab0
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
aa1 [tx1] bb1 [tx2]
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa2 bb2
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa3 bb3
|
||||
|
|
||||
bb4
|
||||
|
||||
Problematic case:
|
||||
|
||||
1. User 1 receives BTC in tx1 from utxo1 in block aa1.
|
||||
2. User 2 receives BTC in tx2 from utxo1 (same) in block bb1
|
||||
3. User 1 sees 2 confirmations at block aa3.
|
||||
4. Reorg into bb chain.
|
||||
5. User 1 asks `listsinceblock aa3` and does not see that tx1 is now
|
||||
invalidated.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently the solution to this is to detect that a reorg'd block is
|
||||
asked for in listsinceblock, and to iterate back over existing blocks up
|
||||
until the fork point, and to include all transactions that relate to the
|
||||
node wallet.
|
||||
'''
|
||||
self.log.info("Test double spend")
|
||||
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
# share utxo between nodes[1] and nodes[2]
|
||||
eckey = ECKey()
|
||||
eckey.generate()
|
||||
privkey = bytes_to_wif(eckey.get_bytes())
|
||||
address = key_to_p2wpkh(eckey.get_pubkey().get_bytes())
|
||||
self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(address, 10)
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], 6)
|
||||
self.nodes[2].importprivkey(privkey)
|
||||
utxos = self.nodes[2].listunspent()
|
||||
utxo = [u for u in utxos if u["address"] == address][0]
|
||||
self.nodes[1].importprivkey(privkey)
|
||||
|
||||
# Split network into two
|
||||
self.split_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# send from nodes[1] using utxo to nodes[0]
|
||||
change = '%.8f' % (float(utxo['amount']) - 1.0003)
|
||||
recipient_dict = {
|
||||
self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 1,
|
||||
self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): change,
|
||||
}
|
||||
utxo_dicts = [{
|
||||
'txid': utxo['txid'],
|
||||
'vout': utxo['vout'],
|
||||
}]
|
||||
txid1 = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(
|
||||
self.nodes[1].signrawtransactionwithwallet(
|
||||
self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction(utxo_dicts, recipient_dict))['hex'])
|
||||
|
||||
# send from nodes[2] using utxo to nodes[3]
|
||||
recipient_dict2 = {
|
||||
self.nodes[3].getnewaddress(): 1,
|
||||
self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(): change,
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(
|
||||
self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(
|
||||
self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(utxo_dicts, recipient_dict2))['hex'])
|
||||
|
||||
# generate on both sides
|
||||
lastblockhash = self.generate(self.nodes[1], 3, sync_fun=self.no_op)[2]
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], 4, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
|
||||
self.join_network()
|
||||
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
# gettransaction should work for txid1
|
||||
assert self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)['txid'] == txid1, "gettransaction failed to find txid1"
|
||||
|
||||
# listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include txid1, as seen from nodes[0]
|
||||
lsbres = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
|
||||
assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['removed'])
|
||||
|
||||
# but it should not include 'removed' if include_removed=false
|
||||
lsbres2 = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(blockhash=lastblockhash, include_removed=False)
|
||||
assert 'removed' not in lsbres2
|
||||
|
||||
def test_double_send(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
This tests the case where the same transaction is submitted twice on two
|
||||
separate blocks as part of a reorg. The former will vanish and the
|
||||
latter will appear as the true transaction (with confirmations dropping
|
||||
as a result).
|
||||
|
||||
ab0
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
aa1 [tx1] bb1
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa2 bb2
|
||||
| |
|
||||
aa3 bb3 [tx1]
|
||||
|
|
||||
bb4
|
||||
|
||||
Asserted:
|
||||
|
||||
1. tx1 is listed in listsinceblock.
|
||||
2. It is included in 'removed' as it was removed, even though it is now
|
||||
present in a different block.
|
||||
3. It is listed with a confirmation count of 2 (bb3, bb4), not
|
||||
3 (aa1, aa2, aa3).
|
||||
'''
|
||||
self.log.info("Test double send")
|
||||
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
# Split network into two
|
||||
self.split_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# create and sign a transaction
|
||||
utxos = self.nodes[2].listunspent()
|
||||
utxo = utxos[0]
|
||||
change = '%.8f' % (float(utxo['amount']) - 1.0003)
|
||||
recipient_dict = {
|
||||
self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 1,
|
||||
self.nodes[2].getnewaddress(): change,
|
||||
}
|
||||
utxo_dicts = [{
|
||||
'txid': utxo['txid'],
|
||||
'vout': utxo['vout'],
|
||||
}]
|
||||
signedtxres = self.nodes[2].signrawtransactionwithwallet(
|
||||
self.nodes[2].createrawtransaction(utxo_dicts, recipient_dict))
|
||||
assert signedtxres['complete']
|
||||
|
||||
signedtx = signedtxres['hex']
|
||||
|
||||
# send from nodes[1]; this will end up in aa1
|
||||
txid1 = self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signedtx)
|
||||
|
||||
# generate bb1-bb2 on right side
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], 2, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
|
||||
# send from nodes[2]; this will end up in bb3
|
||||
txid2 = self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedtx)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(txid1, txid2)
|
||||
|
||||
# generate on both sides
|
||||
lastblockhash = self.generate(self.nodes[1], 3, sync_fun=self.no_op)[2]
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], 2, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
|
||||
self.join_network()
|
||||
|
||||
self.sync_all()
|
||||
|
||||
# gettransaction should work for txid1
|
||||
tx1 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
|
||||
assert_equal(tx1['blockheight'], self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tx1['blockhash'])['height'])
|
||||
|
||||
# listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include txid1 in transactions
|
||||
# as well as in removed
|
||||
lsbres = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
|
||||
assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['transactions'])
|
||||
assert any(tx['txid'] == txid1 for tx in lsbres['removed'])
|
||||
|
||||
# find transaction and ensure confirmations is valid
|
||||
for tx in lsbres['transactions']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == txid1:
|
||||
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
# the same check for the removed array; confirmations should STILL be 2
|
||||
for tx in lsbres['removed']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == txid1:
|
||||
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def double_spends_filtered(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
`listsinceblock` was returning conflicted transactions even if they
|
||||
occurred before the specified cutoff blockhash
|
||||
'''
|
||||
self.log.info("Test spends filtered")
|
||||
spending_node = self.nodes[2]
|
||||
dest_address = spending_node.getnewaddress()
|
||||
|
||||
tx_input = dict(
|
||||
sequence=BIP125_SEQUENCE_NUMBER, **next(u for u in spending_node.listunspent()))
|
||||
rawtx = spending_node.createrawtransaction(
|
||||
[tx_input], {dest_address: tx_input["amount"] - Decimal("0.0052300"),
|
||||
spending_node.getrawchangeaddress(): Decimal("0.0050000")})
|
||||
signedtx = spending_node.signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx)
|
||||
orig_tx_id = spending_node.sendrawtransaction(signedtx["hex"])
|
||||
original_tx = spending_node.gettransaction(orig_tx_id)
|
||||
|
||||
double_tx = spending_node.bumpfee(orig_tx_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# check that both transactions exist
|
||||
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(
|
||||
spending_node.getblockhash(spending_node.getblockcount()))
|
||||
original_found = False
|
||||
double_found = False
|
||||
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
|
||||
original_found = True
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
|
||||
double_found = True
|
||||
assert_equal(original_found, True)
|
||||
assert_equal(double_found, True)
|
||||
|
||||
lastblockhash = self.generate(spending_node, 1)[0]
|
||||
|
||||
# check that neither transaction exists
|
||||
block_hash = spending_node.listsinceblock(lastblockhash)
|
||||
original_found = False
|
||||
double_found = False
|
||||
for tx in block_hash['transactions']:
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == original_tx['txid']:
|
||||
original_found = True
|
||||
if tx['txid'] == double_tx['txid']:
|
||||
double_found = True
|
||||
assert_equal(original_found, False)
|
||||
assert_equal(double_found, False)
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
ListSinceBlockTest().main()
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue